.
Feedback

School Board Votes to Continue Extended Day Kindergarten Next Year

Administrators, teachers tout program.

The Canton Board of Education Tuesday night unanimously voted to continue the extended-day kindergarten program next year.

The vote extends the two optional and “lottery” based extended-day sessions at Cherry Brook Primary School to next year and retains the $3,500 fee for Canton parents. School officials, however, said no family would be turned away due to inability to pay.

Prior to the vote, Assistant Superintendent Dr. Jordan Grossman, Cherry Brook Principal Andrew Robbin and extended-day teachers Jessica Papp and Kelly Theriault presented the board with an update on the program.

The presentation included data, videos, examples of student progress and remarks from the teachers.

While it’s difficult to compare students, Robbin said many statistics indicate that the extended-day students are either ahead of normal progress, or in the case of some struggling students, manage to stay statistically comparable to their peers.

Papp and Theriault gave some specific examples of student progress. The teachers also spoke in favor of the program.

Theriault, who was a morning kindergarten teacher last year, said it’s a gift to have the extra time each day. For example, two reading initiatives and a writing program are offered every day rather than the two days a week in the half-day program. Having an entire day also allows time to plan more, yet gives students mental breaks and time for socialization.

“There’s just so much more I can accomplish,” she said.  

Board members had some questions on the program.

Peg Berry, for example, asked about those children who nap and the possible fatigue of going to school all day.

While some students were allowed to nap, they usually quickly get used to the change and soon no longer need to, teachers said.

“It’s really not as much of an issue as you would think,” Papp said.

Board Chairwoman Beth Kandrysawtz said it was one issue discussed last year when the board decided to expand the pilot program to two sessions for this school year. Kandrysawtz said a half-day session can also be stressful due to the need to pack a lot of material into a short timespan. 

In the past some parents have also questioned whether the extended day students would have an unfair advantage over some of their classmates. While he didn’t specifically mention those questions, Robbin said first graders typically come in at varying abilities and the workshop model the school uses easily adapts to that but still allows for individual help and progress.

He also said many parents appreciated the optional nature of the program.

“I was very surprised at the number of parents who were excited to have a choice,” he said.

This year, 37 students are in the extended day program, nine of whom are “Project Choice” students from Hartford. The Canton students were chosen randomly and interest did exceed available slots.

School officials do not yet know how many slots will be open next year and overall kindergarten enrollment is expected to rise from 114 right now. Case had initially asked the board to vote on the matter at its meeting in early February.

The board, however, felt a vote Tuesday would allow Robbin to inform parents at a kindergarten orientation next week that the school would be offering the program.

Last year, the tuition, charged for the first time this year, sparked some debate amongst the board but did not Tuesday although a few members did ask about it. Kandrysawtz said scholarships are available for any financially struggling family whose child made the lottery based program. She also said it is still less expensive than a half-day of day care.

The board also plans to talk more about the program at budget time. While the tuition and grant funds the state awards for the Hartford students in the program make it a financially viable program for two sessions, potential budget and space challenges would need to be discussed before the program could expand.

Case on Tuesday declined to say if he would like to see the program expanded and said those discussions would come during budget season.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Canton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Larry Litton May 22, 2013 at 10:49 am
Well said Mr. Franks! A new town garage is needed, but not at that price tag. The town leadershipRead More needs to offer a far better option to the voters than this. I am also voting NO...
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:26 pm
Hear, hear, Sarah. The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard"Read More attitude--it has nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 11:41 am
@Larry. What are the 3 sites?
Larry Litton May 22, 2013 at 11:02 am
Wow Sarah, $5.4 million dollars is a modest investment? I'm clearly not in the same tax bracket asRead More you! As for facts being distorted, a great example of that is saying Canton "needs to purchase the land". That is absolutely not true, the reality is the selectmen CHOSE to buy land. There are 2 or 3 properties the town already owns that could have been used but the selectmen chose not to. And the site work that will be $1.3 million dollars at Commerce Drive would be considerably less at the already owned properties.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard" attitude--it hasRead More nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 10:52 am
@Steve. Kudos! Nice to see some common sense and decency. The actions of "Citizens for aRead More Better Canton" have been shameful to say the least - attacking critics, distributing misleading information and attacking the good people who volunteer their time to make Canton a better place to live.
Steve Roberto May 21, 2013 at 04:05 pm
It makes me chuckle when someone spends weeks mudslinging, finger pointing, and pot shotting untilRead More the targets of their harassments speak up and then they decide the game is over, well sorry, I have only just begun. I was sickened by the behavior of certain people at the town meeting scheduled to discuss this garage project. Most of them where given a script to read using lies and incorrect numbers to attack members of town boards and commission. They attacked the intelligence, ethics, and integrity of members of the Board of Selectmen, Board of Finance, Permanent Municipal Building Committee and project consultants. You have even managed to involve our neighbors from Barkhamsted in your May 15 Patch submission, referring to them as “Hairshirt wearing radicals who don’t wash their cars”, again full of incorrect numbers and misinformation. I am attending a Board of Ethics Meeting tonight to defend myself from mud slung on me by those finger pointers trying to distract from the facts at hand. These very same people told this town that they wanted a football field and they wanted a pool. They said that the folks in Canton deserved these things. They understood that these things came with a price tag and they were ready to pay it. Funny how the song has changed now that we have changed our focus to a much less glamorous project. Perhaps if we were proposing a hockey rink or an equestrian team $5.4 million wouldn’t be so much.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard" attitude--it hasRead More nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:32 pm
The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard" attitude--it hasRead More nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Solinsky EyeCare May 21, 2013 at 02:45 pm
We are located at 1013 Farmington Avenue in West Hartford. See you there!
Nancy May 20, 2013 at 09:32 am
Where are you located, Solinsky Eyecare?