.
Feedback

The Year of the Teen Librarian in Canton?

Advocates once again ask Board of Selectmen to add 19-hour-a-week position to budget.

Once again the Canton Public Library is seeking a dedicated staff member to implement teen programming.

In his budget request, library director Robert Simon requested a 19-hour a week teen services librarian for a salary of $26,182.

While the position was not included in Chief Administrative Officer Robert Skinner’s proposed 2013-2014 budget, advocates of the position once again appealed to the Board of Selectmen at a recent budget workshop.

Those who spoke, including several library board of trustee members, said the position would fill an important gap, provide safe activities for kids after school, on snow days and throughout the year.

Resident Barbara Naugle was one who spoke in favor of the position. She said book clubs, special programs and mentoring programs would be invaluable.

“The opportunities are pretty wide ranging for such a small investment,” she said. “It would be a huge investment for our kids.”

It’s the fourth year the library has requested the position.

Simon has touted numerous improvements since 2009, some funded by grants, including the creation of a teen zone with bistro tables and stools, “mitt chairs,” and much more, designed to give teens a place to work on homework, read or simply talk, Simon said. Numerous other improvements, materials and some programs have also been offered but a teen librarian is needed to coordinate those and bring it to the next level, he said.

This year, the Board of Selectmen could potentially have enough votes to support the position.

Selectmen have made it very clear that no final decisions have been made and most have stated they want to see where the numbers fall. Initially, however, at least three of the five selectmen — Steve Roberto, Tom Sevigny and Lowell Humphrey — have expressed support for the position. (Even if the selectmen vote to add the position, the budget still has to go to the Board of Finance).

In a recent budget workshop, Roberto said kids like his 12-year-old son are visiting the library after school but lack quality programming. 

"I would really find a way to make this work for the library and I support it 100 percent,” Roberto said. "I think the library could capture some of those kids."

First Selectman Richard Barlow said he wants the library to consider saving funds or raising more revenue. Barlow said some special programs, such as classes or movies, could perhaps have small fees, like they do if offered by the Parks and Recreation Department or other groups.

“I remain concerned that after several years of asking the library to potentially find ways to raise revenue they steadfastly refuse to consider,” he said.

While a letter from library board of trustees chairman Walter Gillette to Skinner raised the idea of the board at least further discussing the idea of a “fee for service” structure with the facility’s portable computer lab, advocates have spoken against the idea of charging for programs. 

Simon said the opposition is “both philosophical and pragmatic,” citing the concept of libraries as "the people's university" since the 1890s. He also feels people would not support programs with a fee and simply go to neighboring libraries.

“The library trustees and I sympathize with the town officers who want to increase income into the general fund, especially with the state cutting back on everything, but libraries are simply not places in business to generate revenue,” he said. “Libraries are service institutions dedicated to education and information and improving quality of life, not to money-generating.”

At the recent workshop, Simon also that in addition to the Friends of the Library support, he also feels the library has done a good job bringing in revenue through grant programs. 

Barlow agreed that the library has a great support structure. 

"What the friends and trustees do is substantial and I certainly appreciate all their efforts," Barlow said. 

Later in the meeting, Barlow also said that there are many other needs to consider in town, including a capital budget (e.g. infrastructure, major vehicle purchases) that should really include more. 

In his comments at the recent budget workshop, library board member Richard Matos said he felt a teen librarian was an invaluable service. In addition, just one case of a teen librarian helping a troubled youth could even save the town money, Matos said.

“(Libraries are) not engines for revenue raising revenue," he said. "They're places where awareness is raised and good citizens are produced, “ he said.

Wednesday, the Board of Selectmen will again meet to discuss the budget and could potentially vote on a proposal to bring to the Board of Finance. 

Also under discussion will be several other positions proposed in Skinner’s preliminary budget, which is $9,541,386, $352,007 or 3.83 percent more than the 2012-2013 budget of $9,189,379. The Board of Selectmen budget does not include the Board of Education spending plan or the town's debt service.

“We’ve got to make some tough decisions and I’ve already come in double that,” Skinner said, referring to selectmen's guideline to bring in a budget with an approximate 2-percent increase. 

The Board of Selectmen will hold a special meeting on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 at 5:00 pm at the Community Center. Please click here to view the agenda.

The Board of Selectmen will hold a regular meeting on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 at 7:00 pm at the Community Center.  Please click here the view the agenda.

See a budget timeline here

As detailed in Skinner's preliminary plan, the personnel proposals under consideration include: 

  • Fire/EMS Business Manager – For several years there has been a need for administrative assistance in the Fire/EMS Department. This is due to several factors including ever increasing regulations, mandates and paperwork along with the increased volume of emergency responses. The position will require someone with a Fire/EMS background along with administrative experience. The position would be responsible for budgeting, procurement, training, reports, coordination between town agencies and general day to day administrative decisions. The position would coordinate activities closely with the Fire Chief and other emergency personnel and work under the direct supervision of the Chief Administrative Officer. The position would be part time 25 hours a week with an annual salary of approximately $42,000.
  • Department of Public Works Administrative Assistant – The Department of Public works consists of 14 full time employees and two part time employees. The Department is responsible for the operations of the Transfer Station along with all road, facility and recreational ground maintenance. The Department has the second highest budget of any department but has no clerical assistance with everything from payroll to purchasing being performed primarily by the Director and Road Foreman. With the focus on pavement management and facility maintenance, the department manager’s time would be better spent on other matters than routine clerical functions. The position would be part time 12 hours a week at an annual salary of $10,810.
  • Senior Center Coordinator – The Senior/Social Services Department is currently staffed by a full time Director and a 25 hour a week Administrative Assistant. The Director’s responsibilities have been increasingly taken up by meeting the social service needs of the Town at the expense of senior programming. In order to meet the needs of the seniors, the Director has requested that a new Senior Center Coordinator position be created. The Director requested the position be 25 hours a week. Based on budget limitations and a desire to review the benefits of the position prior to increasing the hours to 25, I have recommended the position at 16 hours per week. This should allow coverage during substantial senior events, such as luncheons, etc. and still leave time to assist in coordinating senior activities.
  • Compensation – Every other year the Town does a salary survey to determine how the Town’s pay rates compares to those of other neighboring towns within the Farmington Valley and similar towns outside of the Farmington Valley. When 29 similar positions are compared to local averages 25 of the 29 Canton positions are at a pay rate lower than an average of the local towns. When the same positions are compared to similar towns, including towns outside of the Farmington Valley, 21 of the 29 Canton positions are below the average. In order to retain quality employees Canton must maintain competitive rates, or at a minimum, ensure that its rates do not fall too far below those in surrounding towns. Therefore, the rate of pay increase recommended for non-union employees is 2.5%.
  • I am also recommending that the Director of Senior/Social Services receive a $12,000 increase in wages based on that the current rate of pay for the position is 40% below what the local average for the same position; $73,998 regional average compared to the Director’s current salary of $44,217. There is also a recommended increase in the Registrar of Voters’ stipend from $5,000 to $7,000. The increase would still leave them well below what the average is in surrounding towns.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Canton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Peter May 22, 2013 at 05:38 pm
I voted no - this thing is a joke. it's not a public facilty, it's a truck shed. you can buy steelRead More garage enclosures for $200K that will accomplish the exact same result.
Larry Litton May 22, 2013 at 10:49 am
Well said Mr. Franks! A new town garage is needed, but not at that price tag. The town leadershipRead More needs to offer a far better option to the voters than this. I am also voting NO...
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:06 pm
you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to beRead More violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Peter May 22, 2013 at 05:41 pm
Another person claiming the people of Canton are not informed... but you offer no information, justRead More your opinion that we should blindly vote yes. No has yet been able to articulate the "why" and the "value"... what is the return on investment in this pet project? This garage is an absolute SCAM... it's someone's get-rich quick scheme and they will be walking away with $4M and we will be left with a $1.4M garage that isn't needed.
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 05:13 pm
@Larry. Thanks for the reply. I don't know the details of these sites or why they weren't chosen butRead More I do have a few initial thoughts. First, one of the concerns of opponents of the Commerce Drive location is that the garage is a danger to nearby residents, children, bikers and seniors. Those concerns would still exist and would likely be worse in any of the 3 locations you mentioned. In other words, the same problems as the opponents raise now would remain. Second, River Road and Lawton Road are already designated for youth sports. Given the lack of flat land and the shortage of fields in Canton, I don't see how these fields would be replaced. Fields can be built at the River Rd and Lawton Road locations but not on Commerced River. As for the state-owned parcel, I think the state owns that as open space - not land for a town garage. Third, if the people on Lawton Road got so upset about the CVS, I could only imagine the uproar if the town garage is built there! Some don't even want the park! Fourth, I think there is some builout problems with lawton road regarding utilities which makes the site difficult to work with. (or so I read/was told) However, thank you again for the reply. the only real option besides commerce drive is River Road, but as I mentioned above, the opponent's concerns regarding safety would still exist and likely be even worse - right by the bike trail, kids in the area, near a major road, near homes. I don't think that site would satisfy them.
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:06 pm
you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to beRead More violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 10:52 am
@Steve. Kudos! Nice to see some common sense and decency. The actions of "Citizens for aRead More Better Canton" have been shameful to say the least - attacking critics, distributing misleading information and attacking the good people who volunteer their time to make Canton a better place to live.
Steve Roberto May 21, 2013 at 04:05 pm
It makes me chuckle when someone spends weeks mudslinging, finger pointing, and pot shotting untilRead More the targets of their harassments speak up and then they decide the game is over, well sorry, I have only just begun. I was sickened by the behavior of certain people at the town meeting scheduled to discuss this garage project. Most of them where given a script to read using lies and incorrect numbers to attack members of town boards and commission. They attacked the intelligence, ethics, and integrity of members of the Board of Selectmen, Board of Finance, Permanent Municipal Building Committee and project consultants. You have even managed to involve our neighbors from Barkhamsted in your May 15 Patch submission, referring to them as “Hairshirt wearing radicals who don’t wash their cars”, again full of incorrect numbers and misinformation. I am attending a Board of Ethics Meeting tonight to defend myself from mud slung on me by those finger pointers trying to distract from the facts at hand. These very same people told this town that they wanted a football field and they wanted a pool. They said that the folks in Canton deserved these things. They understood that these things came with a price tag and they were ready to pay it. Funny how the song has changed now that we have changed our focus to a much less glamorous project. Perhaps if we were proposing a hockey rink or an equestrian team $5.4 million wouldn’t be so much.
Kevin Jackson May 22, 2013 at 09:39 pm
Sorry Wayne, the real reason was our elected "leaders" couldn't produce a clear case forRead More why we should vote yes and they were unwilling to allow anyone else to bring viable solutions to the table.
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:03 pm
There is one BIG BIG thing missing from this entire six year long process. the need was neverRead More assessed, there is no return on investment, it's complete overkill and wasteful spending and no one challenged the outrageously over priced estimates. And this was not very public... all the key documents are pretty well hidden on Canton's site.. if you don't happen to get the secret hidden link then you won't get the facts. you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to be violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Solinsky EyeCare May 21, 2013 at 02:45 pm
We are located at 1013 Farmington Avenue in West Hartford. See you there!
Nancy May 20, 2013 at 09:32 am
Where are you located, Solinsky Eyecare?