Officials, Residents Promise to Keep Pool in the Forefront

Facility not added for November bonding as some had hoped but selectmen say problems are not being ignored.

Mills Pond Pool may not have been on the table but at recent Board of Finance meeting several residents still spoke in favor of adding funding for it to the November ballot. 

The boards of Selectmen and Finance met last week to discuss projects the town has proposed for bonding. Voters will get their say at the polls Nov. 6. (See related story.)

While the pool will not be on the ballot, at the finance board meeting several residents took the opportunity to try a last effort to get it added. Numerous residents also spoke up at a joint Board of Selectmen/Board of Finance meeting on Aug. 20.  

Robert D. Miller, the one who had started an online "petition," spoke for several minutes about the facility at the Board of Finance meeting last week. With an aging structure, low interest rates and community involvement, the time was right to invest in the facility, Miller said.

“The pool is a tremendous asset that asset has really blossomed over the past three years,” Miller said.

Miller, a past economic development commissioner for the state of Vermont, said it’s another important piece for recreation, property values and economic development. 

“Community assets create livable communities that people want to live in,” Miller said, adding that the pool in its current state does not attract the crowds that it could. 

Other residents spoke out as well but later in the meeting finance board chairman Richard Ohanesian the project was not one the board even had the ability to consider that night.

“The Board of Finance doesn’t add projects,” Ohanesian said.

Last year and early this year, a Capital Projects Study committee, with members from the boards of selectmen and education, as well as community representatives, met to prioritize the town’s needs and recommended four projects for November bonding.

Subsequently, the school board and selectmen recommended vote to move the recommendations forward and on Aug. 20 selectmen officially referred them to the Board of Finance. 

While the pool was discussed by the capital study group, the consensus was that it was not ready to move forward, Chief Administrative Officer Robert Skinner told Patch earlier this year.

A study on the pool was being conducted at the time but a report was not presented to the Board of Selectmen until March, after the capital projects group released its recommendations.

In the public comment portion of last week's meeting, Economic Development Agency chairman and resident Kevin Jackson acknowledged the public push for the pool came late but argued it deserved “serious consideration.”

Board of Finance member Brian First said the comments from those who signed the petition showed that even those residents weren’t all on the same page. Some thought the pool was closing, some wanted a direct replacement while others mentioned other possible configurations, First said.

“The group of supporters needs to clarify the message,” First said.

The pool study, for example, shows a potential configuration that differs from one large 50-meter area but rather shows a 25-meter rectangular shaped, 6-lane area that is connected to a kind of fan shaped family swimming area. (See attached graphic). It also recommends a splash pad and completely redoing the changing areas. 

Others have argued that the pool should remain in its 50-meter pool configuration since such facilities are limited and can be used to hold meets and generate revenue.

First Selectman Richard Barlow has even suggested the possibility of eventually having an indoor pool at the high school and selectman Steve Roberto has said the town should further explore the idea of a private company running the pool.

With various ideas and no developed plans, on Aug. 20 several selectmen said there was not enough information to move forward.

Still, Miller contended officials had a good idea of what’s needed and that the problems are well identified.

In last week’s meeting, finance board member Mary Tomolonius lamented the pool not being included in the bonding in some form.

“I think it’s a shame the pool wasn’t included in this,” she said. “It’s a huge gathering place for people young and old.”

Following the week’s meetings, Miller expressed disappointment that pool funding was not added but said he and others will continue to push for more funding.

“We will continue to (urge) the Board of Selectmen and the town to take its commitment to the pool seriously to ensure its survival and the continued use and enjoyment by the community,” he wrote in an e-mail to Patch. “It's unfortunate that we are forced to take such actions when the pool is an existing asset and responsibility of the town and Board of Selectmen. We have clearly demonstrated widespread support for the pool. We have been thoughtful, respectful, and informative. Unfortunately we have been ignored and dismissed by our town leaders. As of now there remains no credible plan to address the state of disrepair of the pool.”

But selectmen said the pool is not being ignored. 

“The board is committed to maintaining the integrity of the pool,” Barlow told Patch late last week.

Barlow feels it was not ready to move forward and added that he respected the capital study group's recommendations and the process. 

Barlow also said the short-term recommendations in the pool study were completed and the town is looking at the next phase. Earlier this summer, selectmen said they would likely apply next year for a Small Town Economic Assistance Program Funds for the pool.

Barlow said he also had some additional ideas for pool funding but wanted to discuss them with other selectmen before making them public.

See the pool study here.

Mike September 04, 2012 at 11:18 AM
Spending $600,000 for the land where they want to build a new town garage seems a bit outrageous. Investing in a new town swimming pool would be far more beneficial to the residents of Canton.
Canton Taxpayer September 04, 2012 at 02:23 PM
Problem with that theory is....we actually NEED a town garage that's not in a flood plain.....
Kevin Jackson September 04, 2012 at 03:33 PM
The town does need a new garage, just not on that sight for that much money. The masses say no on that question.
Kevin Jackson September 04, 2012 at 03:38 PM
Site work and acquisition costs for the 5 Cherry Brook location are well in excess of $3 Million and the building is much more than adequately sized. As usual, we need to re-prioritize.
Canton Taxpayer September 04, 2012 at 03:43 PM
Do you have a site in mind that would work out for the Town, Mr. Jackson? I believe the PMBC has looked at many many sites over the past few years, none suitable for the Town Garage needs. I agree, we need to prioritize -- needs vs. wants. I'd like a new pool as much as the next taxpayer, but I believe priorities should start with necessities.
Kevin Jackson September 04, 2012 at 03:52 PM
Sadly I do not. However, the lack of an appropriate site does not necessarily mean we should over pay for that one.
Mike September 04, 2012 at 04:36 PM
Canton has many things located in a "flood plain" which apparently don't concern folks. The ideal placement would have been in an area of the Collins Company.
Betty September 04, 2012 at 07:04 PM
Fact is we need a town garage, and the need was first identified 23 years ago. Countless locations have been considered since. The suggested location is an easy access to Canton's two major corridors, and it will not be disruptive to abutting homes. I believe it will be hidden from view, and there is already a water and sewer hookup. We will be able to house all equipment and supplies at one location saving time, and money. People have been saying there is a better location for years, yet no one ever comes up with the address. If you know of a more suitable location you should speak up now. We need to move forward on building a garage and stop wasting time and money preventing it. Vote yes and make the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) happy.
Betty September 04, 2012 at 07:26 PM
Given the nature of the land in Canton there will be associated site costs of one sort or another with all locations, maybe we should consider other towns.
Canton Taxpayer September 04, 2012 at 08:23 PM
It certainly concerns me that all of our town vehicles are in a flood plain. And have you seen the garage the employees work out of now? It's actually dangerous for the town employees (OSHA would have a field day in that barn). I have no problem with the Bd. of Finance lowering the amount for the garage itself and/or making the building itself smaller, but ONLY to lower-the-impending-increase to my taxes.
David C Keefe September 05, 2012 at 12:23 AM
As a former resident of Canton, who learned to swim in the " old Canton pool " the same place where the fishing derby was held, when the Mills Park Rec Center was opened, we could not wait to join. We fondly remember the night swims, swimming lessons, fun in the heat of the summer, where parents could leave their kids in the safe hands of lifegaurds... friendships were formed, life choices were made there... please consider these rambelings on one who is in favor of the pool being brought back to the glory of its intention.... David C Keefe
Andrew Ziemba September 05, 2012 at 01:16 AM
Are you speaking of the old abandoned place that was right along the old rail road that is now the rail to trail paved path? I have always wanted to learn about the past of this place... For over 20 years I have always walked past it and been curios to learn of its past. It's always been sad to see it laying in disrepair. I heard that it was owned by someone else now and can't help but wish that it could be used for something nice again.
Betty September 05, 2012 at 12:32 PM
I grew up in Canton too, and was around for the 1955 flood. I think it would be great for Canton to have a year round indoor pool. It would be used by a greater percentage of the population than the multipurpose field, and I would support it before the multi-purpose field once the roads and highway garage have been addressed.
Diane September 05, 2012 at 01:50 PM
I am with David...Boy do I remember taking swimming lessons in that "pond". My whole family was so excited to have an actual pool to swim in. Old Doc Diters was busy with all the swimmer's ear cases because we were not use to chlorine! They say when you buy a house keep it up or you will pay for it later...and that's what Canton has become. An old house, putting off repairs and up-grades year after year until they are overwhelming. The roads, the garage, the pool are just some. We can't continue on like this. I only wish that my children who are also growing up in Canton have the same as I did.
Betty September 05, 2012 at 02:12 PM
Canton Taxpayer's comment below is absolutely right. Not only are all our town vehicles in a flood plain, they are feet from the river. In 1955 neighboring buildings washed away. The present location is potentially bad for the river and with each delay we run the risk of bearing much greater cost for Canton. Building a new garage is more prudent than running the risks we chance by not addressing this long overdue obligation.
Betty September 05, 2012 at 03:01 PM
Diane, I remember that "pond" very well, it was nasty and scary.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »