.
Feedback

Election Day 2012: Voter Turnout in Canton Was 81 Percent

Election Day was off to busy start but voting slowed in evening.

Please see our story about the local races here and one on the referendum results here

Post poll closing update

When all was said and done Wednesday, 81 percent of Canton's registered voters came out to the polls Tuesday. 

A total of 5,718, or 81 percent of the 7,079 registered voters cast ballots. (The presidential race may have higher numbers due to a law that lets people register for that vote only on Election Day) 

Moderator Lorinda Pane said officials were surprised the number was not higher after the busy start Tuesday morning. 

"It's not as good as we hoped for," Pane said shortly after the polls closed. "It got slower in the last couple of hours." 

According to the Secretary of the State numbers Canton had an 84 percent turnout four years ago. 

See how Canton voted on the town Web site

Earlier story 

Shortly before 8 p.m. Tuesday, 5,679, or roughly 80 percent, of Canton's 7,078 registered voters had cast ballots. 

Voting was off to a steady from 6 a.m. when the polls opened but slowed a little after noon. Shortly before 10 a.m. 1,796 had voted, approximately 25 percent of the 7,075 registered in town.

By 11:20 a.m. it was 35 percent with 2,508 casting votes. Poll workers said the lines had been steady since 6 a.m. 

At 1:30 p.m. it was 3,672, approximately 52 percent. At 4:30 p.m., it was 4,615, about 65 percent of those registered. 

The figures do include absentee ballots. 

That includes 2,158 Democrats, 2,106 Republicans, 2,744 unaffiliated and 67 other (Green, Independent, Working Families, Libertarian, etc.) 

Today, Canton voters will make their choose a president, a U.S. Senator, a U.S. Representative from the 5th District, a state Senator from the 8th District and a state Representative from the 17th District.

In addition, voters will decide whether the town should bond (essentially borrow money and pay back with interest for the following: 

On Nov. 6, voters can say yes or no to two proposals:

  • A $3.615 Million track, multi-use field and parking lot improvement project at Canton High School
  • $3.2 Million for partial roof replacements at the Community Center and all three schools ($2.3 Million after federal reimbursement) 

Documents related to the projects can be found on the town's web site.  

See below for information on where to go to cast your ballot and the list of candidates. We've also included how Canton voted in 2008, the year of the last presidential election, and in 2010, the last mid-term election.

Read it over, then visit your local polling station between 6 a.m. and 8 p.m. to make your voice heard! And be sure to check back with Patch for updates throughout the day, including the announcement of the winners as soon as votes are tallied.

Canton Polling Station

  • Canton Town Hall, 4 Market St., Collinsville

How Canton Voted in 2008 (84% Turnout)*

(D=Democrat; R=Republican; G=Green; I=Independent; WF=Working Families; CL=Connecticut for Lieberman)

PRESIDENT

  • Obama-Biden (D) — 3,412 votes
  • McCain-Palin (R) — 2,472 votes

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 5th DISTRICT

  • Chris Murphy (D) — 2,978 votes
  • David Cappiello (R) — 2,199 votes

8th SENATE DISTRICT

  • Arthur House (D) — 1,959 votes (125 Working Families votes) 
  • Kevin Witkos (R) — 3,599 votes 

17th ASSEMBLY DISTRICT

  • Brett Eisenlohr (D) — 2,017 votes (145 Working families)
  • Timothy LeGeyt (R) — 3,450 votes

How Canton Voted in 2010 (69% Turnout)

(D=Democrat; R=Republican; G=Green; I=Independent; WF=Working Families; CL=Connecticut for Lieberman; SA=Socialist Action)

U.S. SENATE

  • Richard Blumenthal (D) — 2,170 votes
  • Linda McMahon (R) — 2,248 votes

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 5th DISTRICT

  • Chris Murphy (D) — 2,399 votes (Working Families 98)
  • Sam Caligiuri (R) — 2,007 votes (38 - I) 

8th SENATE DISTRICT

  • Donald O'Brien (D) — 1,195 votes (54 Working Families Votes) 
  • Kevin Witkos (R) — 3,292 votes

17th ASSEMBLY DISTRICT

  • Chris Gaffney (D) — 1,329 votes
  • Timothy LeGeyt (R) — 3,195 votes

.......................................

*Results according to the Connecticut Secretary of the State's Office. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Canton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Larry Litton May 22, 2013 at 10:49 am
Well said Mr. Franks! A new town garage is needed, but not at that price tag. The town leadershipRead More needs to offer a far better option to the voters than this. I am also voting NO...
Steve Roberto May 22, 2013 at 03:06 pm
Hey Larry, Wyatt asked you for the other 3 sites. Lets hear your answer and why exactly you feelRead More they will work. The EDA has been saying garbage like that for over a year. The Board of Selectman asked them three times to share their data. Of course they delivered nothing yet continue to say there is a better way. They have had plenty of times to show a better plan.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:26 pm
Hear, hear, Sarah. The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard"Read More attitude--it has nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 11:41 am
@Larry. What are the 3 sites?
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard" attitude--it hasRead More nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 10:52 am
@Steve. Kudos! Nice to see some common sense and decency. The actions of "Citizens for aRead More Better Canton" have been shameful to say the least - attacking critics, distributing misleading information and attacking the good people who volunteer their time to make Canton a better place to live.
Steve Roberto May 21, 2013 at 04:05 pm
It makes me chuckle when someone spends weeks mudslinging, finger pointing, and pot shotting untilRead More the targets of their harassments speak up and then they decide the game is over, well sorry, I have only just begun. I was sickened by the behavior of certain people at the town meeting scheduled to discuss this garage project. Most of them where given a script to read using lies and incorrect numbers to attack members of town boards and commission. They attacked the intelligence, ethics, and integrity of members of the Board of Selectmen, Board of Finance, Permanent Municipal Building Committee and project consultants. You have even managed to involve our neighbors from Barkhamsted in your May 15 Patch submission, referring to them as “Hairshirt wearing radicals who don’t wash their cars”, again full of incorrect numbers and misinformation. I am attending a Board of Ethics Meeting tonight to defend myself from mud slung on me by those finger pointers trying to distract from the facts at hand. These very same people told this town that they wanted a football field and they wanted a pool. They said that the folks in Canton deserved these things. They understood that these things came with a price tag and they were ready to pay it. Funny how the song has changed now that we have changed our focus to a much less glamorous project. Perhaps if we were proposing a hockey rink or an equestrian team $5.4 million wouldn’t be so much.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard" attitude--it hasRead More nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:32 pm
The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard" attitude--it hasRead More nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Solinsky EyeCare May 21, 2013 at 02:45 pm
We are located at 1013 Farmington Avenue in West Hartford. See you there!
Nancy May 20, 2013 at 09:32 am
Where are you located, Solinsky Eyecare?