.
Feedback

Former Canton Dispatcher Complains of Racial Discrimination, Retaliation in Avon

Nichole Brown has filed a CHRO complaint against the Avon Police Department, but department officials say her demotion, suspension and termination were due to misconduct.

Avon Police Chief Mark Rinaldo's former secretary has filed a complaint with the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO) against the police department.

Nichole Brown, of Farmington, claims that racial discrimination and retaliation factored into her demotion to a records aide, suspension and eventual termination.

"I was suspended without pay/transferred/demoted on or about March 27, 2012 due to my race/color (black), I was the recipient of bias in Respondent's investigation and appeal process due to race/color and in retaliation for complaining about discrimination on or about April 11, 2012, and I was issued a written warning and terminated on or about June 6, 2012 and believe that my race/color (black), previous opposition were in part factors in this action," Brown's complaint, dated July 17, stated.

Rinaldo received notification from the CHRO of the complaint on Aug. 6. PDFs of the Brown's CHRO complaint and previous appeals, as well as internal police department investigation reports and termination recommendation letters are attached to this article.

While Brown felt that her punishment was more severe than usual for department employees, Avon Police Department leadership said that the actions were taken because of misconduct on her part.

"Any claim that the Town of Avon took an adverse employment action against Ms. Brown for reasons other than her own misconduct is in conflict with overwhelming evidence to the contrary," Avon Police Capt. Jeffrey Blatter wrote in an email to Avon Patch. 

Brown began working as a per diem dispatcher for Avon in 2009 and also was a Canton police dispatcher at the time. In November 2011, she left her Canton dispatching position and accepted a probationary administrative secretary II job in Rinaldo's office.

In March, she was suspended for five days without pay and demoted to a records aide position because department leaders felt that she overstepped her authority. By June, she was terminated.

“I’m trying to be able to clear my name about being dishonest and unethical,"  said Brown, who has worked for municipalities since she was 18 and was temporarily a police officer in Plainville. “To be labeled as that was heartbreaking for me.”

Additionally, on Sept. 13, the state Employment Security Appeals Division in Waterbury dismissed Brown's motion to reopen the case for a Aug. 16 appeal. Her appeal contested the Department of Labor's July ruling that she was ineligible unemployment benefits. Brown had filed an unemployment benefits claim with the Employment Security Division in June after the town of Avon denied her unemployment benefits following her termination.

Brown said the termination took a toll on her mentally and she and her husband financially. They went from two incomes to one and she is also concerned because they need insurance to cover therapy for their child who has Down syndrome.

Brown's Suspension and Demotion

Her suspension and demotion were disciplinary measures taken after she drafted an update to a previous sick bank leave policy in February without authorization from Rinaldo, according to an internal investigation conducted late that month. She sent the policy to Town Manager Brandon Robertson and then to Human Resources, also intending it for two police union presidents.

"I was demoted for an innocent mistake and I admitted my mistake," Brown said, noting that she appealed the claim that her actions were "dishonest and unethical."

She said Rinaldo asked her to pull the file for the sick bank leave policy. A dispatcher needed to go on leave because a family member had medical issues. The existing policy allowed workers to donate unused paid sick days to employees who needed that time off for medical reasons. It didn't originally pertain to immediate family, but she said her edit from "will not" to "will" changed the meaning to allow it.

"Ms. Brown exceeded the scope of her assigned duties and responsibilities, and acted outside the authority of the chief of police," according to the investigation conclusion.

Brown said she told the human resources assistant that she changed the word.

"No one was harmed or slighted in any type of way,” Brown said.

According to Blatter's investigation report, Brown told him she was trying to help her fellow employee and was not trying to misrepresent the policy draft change.

Brown said that when she couldn't find the chief to ask him what to do with the policy, she asked Blatter. She said he responded by asking her what she thought she should do and whether the chief needed to sign off on it.

Brown admitted that she wasn't given direction on what to do, but she said she didn't think she needed the chief's signature to draft an update to the policy so she took the initiative because it was out of date.

Brown's Termination

On March 4, Brown was demoted to the Records Division.

Brown said that two people that knew of her edit to the sick bank leave policy weren't interviewed in the internal investigation. She tried to find a past email with evidence validating her claim, but she was given a new username and was not able to access her original email account.

She contacted the information technology representative that serves the department on April 25 to ask for help accessing her original email account.

Rinaldo asked Blatter to do a second internal affairs investigation when he found out that she did this without his permission. Blatter determined that Brown violated a department general order "for attempting to access a department account she was not authorized to access."

Brown said that she received notification of the investigation two hours after she asked Robertson about the status of a Freedom of Information request related to her demotion and suspension.

In a letter Rinaldo wrote to Robertson recommending Brown's termination, he also said that Brown showed disrespect to Lt. Kelly Walsh when she resumed work after her suspension. She didn't make eye contact with Walsh in a meeting outlining her new responsibilities as a records aide, the letter said. Brown said that was because she was taking notes.

He also said that she created a "hostile workplace environment" by not being cordial to another coworker. In a letter Blatter wrote to Rinaldo recommending her termination, he said that in May, Brown threw mail "on and around" the "in-basket" for Rinaldo's new secretary, Pamela Prado, who was promoted from records aide to fill the position. Brown left the room without saying a word to Prado, the report said.

Brown said that she no longer knew who to trust in the department after her suspension and demotion, so she decided to do her job and avoid personal chit chat.

Why Brown Filed CHRO Complaint

Before going to the CHRO, two appeals Brown filed to overturn the disciplinary measures taken against her were unsuccessful.

"My understanding is that the people who made the decision to demote me were going to hear my appeal," she said.

She wanted to file a grievance against the town with the State Labor Board of Mediation, but said the town refused to do so because her appeals were considered closed.

“They abused their authority and did everything to block my right to due process," Brown told Patch. "That’s why I had to go to the CHRO.”

Brown said last week that the process for the CHRO complaint is still in its early stages.

Timeline of Events

Date Sequence of Events Leading Up to CHRO Complaint  2009 Nichole Brown begins working as a dispatcher when needed at the Avon Police Department, usually twice a week, she told Patch. She also works as a police dispatcher in Canton at this time. Nov. 7, 2011 Brown is hired as a probationary administrative secretary to Avon Police Chief Mark Rinaldo. She leaves the Canton Police Department, according to department records.
Feb. 22, 2012 Brown delivers a department memorandum about updates to the sick bank leave policy to Town Manager Brandon Robertson and then Human Resources, according to department records.
Feb. 27, 2012 Rinaldo informs Brown that the department would be conducting an internal investigation into her actions. Feb. 29, 2012 Brown receives a written warning about the investigation. March 27, 2012 The investigation into Brown is completed. Rinaldo told her she violated section of the town's personnel plan "for failing to meet prescribed work standards and engaging in dishonest and unethical behavior," according to the complaint. March 28 to April 4, 2012 Brown is suspended for five business days without pay. She was also demoted to a records aide position. March 29, 2012 Brown requests an appeal hearing. April 4, 2012 Brown meets with Lt. Kelly Walsh to learn of her new duties. April 11, 2012 Brown's public appeal hearing takes place. April 16, 2012 Brown receives notice from Robertson that he has decided to uphold her suspension and demotion, as well as the internal investigation. April 20, 2012 Brown requests the town submit her appeal to the state labor board for review. April 25, 2012 Avon Police Department officials learn that Brown was trying to access the email account she used secretary. A second internal investigation begins. April 26, 2012 Robertson denies Brown's labor board mediation request. May 4, 2012 Brown submits grievance to Rinaldo, stating that she believed "the decisions, discipline and appeal processed were biased, unfair and partial" and that the discipline against her was based on her "race/color" and "retaliatory due to my verbal protected activity." May 8, 2012 Rinaldo denies Brown's grievance request, according to the CHRO complaint. May 24, 2012 Capt. Jeffrey Blatter meets with Brown, addressing concerns that she was creating a "hostile work environment" after complaint from Prado.
May 25, 2012 Blatter recommends Brown's termination to Rinaldo. June 6, 2012 Brown receives a written warning and termination letter "due to incidents that collectively demonstrated a pattern of employment in which I was counseled and/or disciplined without improvement," according to the CHRO complaint. June 8, 2012 Brown requests appeal hearing with Robertson, according to the CHRO complaint. June 15, 2012 Brown's second appeals hearing takes place, according to the CHRO complaint. July 5, 2012 Robertson decides to uphold second internal investigation and termination, according to the CHRO complaint. July 17, 2012 Brown files a CHRO complaint against the Avon Police Department.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Canton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
officerthor May 24, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Actually, the company/person who developed the area took the risk and made a huge investment andRead More purchased it from the former owners who knew the intended use when they sold. I much prefer woods myself but blaming the current residents is off base. The fact is the residents of this single neighborhood comprise a considerable percentage of Canton's tax base. (you probably pay less taxes because of them) I don't live there but in my opinion they don't deserve to have what will sound like a construction site plopped in their back yards and be expected to pay 14K plus a year in taxes. You'll be voting on a proposed garage again and I suspect next time it will be at an appropriate site. TGS
Peter May 22, 2013 at 05:38 pm
I voted no - this thing is a joke. it's not a public facilty, it's a truck shed. you can buy steelRead More garage enclosures for $200K that will accomplish the exact same result.
Larry Litton May 22, 2013 at 10:49 am
Well said Mr. Franks! A new town garage is needed, but not at that price tag. The town leadershipRead More needs to offer a far better option to the voters than this. I am also voting NO...
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:06 pm
you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to beRead More violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Peter May 22, 2013 at 05:41 pm
Another person claiming the people of Canton are not informed... but you offer no information, justRead More your opinion that we should blindly vote yes. No has yet been able to articulate the "why" and the "value"... what is the return on investment in this pet project? This garage is an absolute SCAM... it's someone's get-rich quick scheme and they will be walking away with $4M and we will be left with a $1.4M garage that isn't needed.
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 05:13 pm
@Larry. Thanks for the reply. I don't know the details of these sites or why they weren't chosen butRead More I do have a few initial thoughts. First, one of the concerns of opponents of the Commerce Drive location is that the garage is a danger to nearby residents, children, bikers and seniors. Those concerns would still exist and would likely be worse in any of the 3 locations you mentioned. In other words, the same problems as the opponents raise now would remain. Second, River Road and Lawton Road are already designated for youth sports. Given the lack of flat land and the shortage of fields in Canton, I don't see how these fields would be replaced. Fields can be built at the River Rd and Lawton Road locations but not on Commerced River. As for the state-owned parcel, I think the state owns that as open space - not land for a town garage. Third, if the people on Lawton Road got so upset about the CVS, I could only imagine the uproar if the town garage is built there! Some don't even want the park! Fourth, I think there is some builout problems with lawton road regarding utilities which makes the site difficult to work with. (or so I read/was told) However, thank you again for the reply. the only real option besides commerce drive is River Road, but as I mentioned above, the opponent's concerns regarding safety would still exist and likely be even worse - right by the bike trail, kids in the area, near a major road, near homes. I don't think that site would satisfy them.
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:06 pm
you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to beRead More violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 10:52 am
@Steve. Kudos! Nice to see some common sense and decency. The actions of "Citizens for aRead More Better Canton" have been shameful to say the least - attacking critics, distributing misleading information and attacking the good people who volunteer their time to make Canton a better place to live.
Steve Roberto May 21, 2013 at 04:05 pm
It makes me chuckle when someone spends weeks mudslinging, finger pointing, and pot shotting untilRead More the targets of their harassments speak up and then they decide the game is over, well sorry, I have only just begun. I was sickened by the behavior of certain people at the town meeting scheduled to discuss this garage project. Most of them where given a script to read using lies and incorrect numbers to attack members of town boards and commission. They attacked the intelligence, ethics, and integrity of members of the Board of Selectmen, Board of Finance, Permanent Municipal Building Committee and project consultants. You have even managed to involve our neighbors from Barkhamsted in your May 15 Patch submission, referring to them as “Hairshirt wearing radicals who don’t wash their cars”, again full of incorrect numbers and misinformation. I am attending a Board of Ethics Meeting tonight to defend myself from mud slung on me by those finger pointers trying to distract from the facts at hand. These very same people told this town that they wanted a football field and they wanted a pool. They said that the folks in Canton deserved these things. They understood that these things came with a price tag and they were ready to pay it. Funny how the song has changed now that we have changed our focus to a much less glamorous project. Perhaps if we were proposing a hockey rink or an equestrian team $5.4 million wouldn’t be so much.
Kevin Jackson May 22, 2013 at 09:39 pm
Sorry Wayne, the real reason was our elected "leaders" couldn't produce a clear case forRead More why we should vote yes and they were unwilling to allow anyone else to bring viable solutions to the table.
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:03 pm
There is one BIG BIG thing missing from this entire six year long process. the need was neverRead More assessed, there is no return on investment, it's complete overkill and wasteful spending and no one challenged the outrageously over priced estimates. And this was not very public... all the key documents are pretty well hidden on Canton's site.. if you don't happen to get the secret hidden link then you won't get the facts. you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to be violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Solinsky EyeCare May 21, 2013 at 02:45 pm
We are located at 1013 Farmington Avenue in West Hartford. See you there!
Nancy May 20, 2013 at 09:32 am
Where are you located, Solinsky Eyecare?