.
Feedback

From the Candidate: Richard Barlow

Sitting First Selectman/candidate gives take on road maintenance.

I would first like to take this opportunity to discuss the Town’s comprehensive plan for road maintenance.

In the ten years prior to my becoming First Selectman the Town spent $220,000 per year on road maintenance. Of that amount approximately $130,000 per year came from revenues received under the State Town Aid to Roads (TAR) program.

A review of our road system quickly reveals that –

  • decades of underfunding have taken a toll on our roads
  • the Town’s failure to use crack sealing, a technique commonly used by other towns and even homeowners, has removed a common method to control road decay from our maintenance program
  • many of our roads have gone so long without proper maintenance that total reconstruction is the only option
  • the Town needs to increase its annual road maintenance funding level

As part of my first budget in FY08-09 we increased the town’s funding for road maintenance by $100,000, over twice the Town’s annual share of $90,000 in the preceding ten years. In the FY10-11 budget we recognized that there was a need for a Pavement Management Plan to develop a long term course of action. Despite previous estimates by the Town Engineer that such a study would cost $150,000 we were able to obtain consultant services for $30,000 to accomplish that task.

The Pavement Management Plan which was placed on the Town website and was one of the items discussed at the Annual Town meeting provided the first comprehensive analysis of our roads, including pavement condition, curbing and drainage issues. It graded each road by specific sections, i.e., intersection to intersection, and recommended techniques necessary to achieve a reasonable condition. The Plan recommends various techniques of maintenance based on road condition including crack sealing, overlying, chip sealing and total reconstruction.

The Plan recommends the Town allocate approximately $700,000 per year for road maintenance and that the cost to return our road to high standards could cost $15M to $17M. Most Towns choose to achieve a fair to good or C+ standard. Obviously if we choose to accept that standard the costs would be less.

The current adopted Town budget for FY11-12 increased the annual maintenance level to $425,000. Next year the budget should be increased an additional $200,000 to the $625,000 in order to move closer to the Plan’s recommended spending level.

The only way to accomplish the significant improvements needed to bring our road back to an acceptable level in a timely manner will be through the use of bond monies.  Towns have recognized that annual budget appropriations cannot fund the improvements necessary to upgrade their road systems. Recently, the Towns of Avon, Farmington, Simsbury, Suffield, Berlin and Enfield have approved such funding. Several weeks ago East Hampton approved $3M in bonding for road upgrades.

For the past several years the Board of Finance has advised the Boards of Selectmen and Education that they were not ready to consider any new bonding until FY2012 when the Town’s debt level had been reduced. As we approach that date I would recommend that the Town consider allocating $4M to $6M for future road repairs and upgrades.

The second issue to address is the Board of Selectmen’s request to use $160,000 of the $198,000 surplus funds from the fiscal year which ended June 30, 2011 to augment this year’s road maintenance funding. That  surplus occurred because the Town was able to spend less than projected in such accounts as attorney fees and employee benefits. After the reallocation of these monies the Town’s Auditors have determined that our unallocated fund balance will still be at an acceptable level.

Some political candidates would have you believe that these monies should have been accounted for by raising the tax rate this year. In fact that would result in taxpayers having been taxed twice for the same money since the $160,000 came from previous year taxes that were already paid for by taxpayers.

The current adopted Selectmen’s budget was a 1.5 percent increase, not a 2.8 percent increase over the previous year expenditure level. In the past three years the Selectmen responded to the current fiscal crisis by decreasing the budget by an average of ½ percent per year while increasing the expenditure for road maintenance to $425,000 this year.

Surpluses occur because of good fiscal management and costs of services being lower than anticipated. That is not election year political gimmickry as alleged by some candidates for office but what taxpayers should expect of their town officials. If the Town is able to provide its services this year while achieving a surplus the additional monies should again be used for additional road improvements.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Canton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Peter May 22, 2013 at 05:38 pm
I voted no - this thing is a joke. it's not a public facilty, it's a truck shed. you can buy steelRead More garage enclosures for $200K that will accomplish the exact same result.
Larry Litton May 22, 2013 at 10:49 am
Well said Mr. Franks! A new town garage is needed, but not at that price tag. The town leadershipRead More needs to offer a far better option to the voters than this. I am also voting NO...
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:06 pm
you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to beRead More violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Peter May 22, 2013 at 05:41 pm
Another person claiming the people of Canton are not informed... but you offer no information, justRead More your opinion that we should blindly vote yes. No has yet been able to articulate the "why" and the "value"... what is the return on investment in this pet project? This garage is an absolute SCAM... it's someone's get-rich quick scheme and they will be walking away with $4M and we will be left with a $1.4M garage that isn't needed.
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 05:13 pm
@Larry. Thanks for the reply. I don't know the details of these sites or why they weren't chosen butRead More I do have a few initial thoughts. First, one of the concerns of opponents of the Commerce Drive location is that the garage is a danger to nearby residents, children, bikers and seniors. Those concerns would still exist and would likely be worse in any of the 3 locations you mentioned. In other words, the same problems as the opponents raise now would remain. Second, River Road and Lawton Road are already designated for youth sports. Given the lack of flat land and the shortage of fields in Canton, I don't see how these fields would be replaced. Fields can be built at the River Rd and Lawton Road locations but not on Commerced River. As for the state-owned parcel, I think the state owns that as open space - not land for a town garage. Third, if the people on Lawton Road got so upset about the CVS, I could only imagine the uproar if the town garage is built there! Some don't even want the park! Fourth, I think there is some builout problems with lawton road regarding utilities which makes the site difficult to work with. (or so I read/was told) However, thank you again for the reply. the only real option besides commerce drive is River Road, but as I mentioned above, the opponent's concerns regarding safety would still exist and likely be even worse - right by the bike trail, kids in the area, near a major road, near homes. I don't think that site would satisfy them.
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:06 pm
you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to beRead More violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 10:52 am
@Steve. Kudos! Nice to see some common sense and decency. The actions of "Citizens for aRead More Better Canton" have been shameful to say the least - attacking critics, distributing misleading information and attacking the good people who volunteer their time to make Canton a better place to live.
Steve Roberto May 21, 2013 at 04:05 pm
It makes me chuckle when someone spends weeks mudslinging, finger pointing, and pot shotting untilRead More the targets of their harassments speak up and then they decide the game is over, well sorry, I have only just begun. I was sickened by the behavior of certain people at the town meeting scheduled to discuss this garage project. Most of them where given a script to read using lies and incorrect numbers to attack members of town boards and commission. They attacked the intelligence, ethics, and integrity of members of the Board of Selectmen, Board of Finance, Permanent Municipal Building Committee and project consultants. You have even managed to involve our neighbors from Barkhamsted in your May 15 Patch submission, referring to them as “Hairshirt wearing radicals who don’t wash their cars”, again full of incorrect numbers and misinformation. I am attending a Board of Ethics Meeting tonight to defend myself from mud slung on me by those finger pointers trying to distract from the facts at hand. These very same people told this town that they wanted a football field and they wanted a pool. They said that the folks in Canton deserved these things. They understood that these things came with a price tag and they were ready to pay it. Funny how the song has changed now that we have changed our focus to a much less glamorous project. Perhaps if we were proposing a hockey rink or an equestrian team $5.4 million wouldn’t be so much.
Kevin Jackson May 22, 2013 at 09:39 pm
Sorry Wayne, the real reason was our elected "leaders" couldn't produce a clear case forRead More why we should vote yes and they were unwilling to allow anyone else to bring viable solutions to the table.
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:03 pm
There is one BIG BIG thing missing from this entire six year long process. the need was neverRead More assessed, there is no return on investment, it's complete overkill and wasteful spending and no one challenged the outrageously over priced estimates. And this was not very public... all the key documents are pretty well hidden on Canton's site.. if you don't happen to get the secret hidden link then you won't get the facts. you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to be violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Solinsky EyeCare May 21, 2013 at 02:45 pm
We are located at 1013 Farmington Avenue in West Hartford. See you there!
Nancy May 20, 2013 at 09:32 am
Where are you located, Solinsky Eyecare?