.
Feedback

We all have a right to live free from fear of violence.

The League of Women Voters has been a strong advocate of support for the mentally ill and of protecting the public from gun violence. Now it's time to step it up.

 

The Canton League of Women Voters joins the citizens of Connecticut, and those of the nation, in mourning the senseless and violent loss of life of children and staff at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown.

We believe that all children deserve to be free from gun violence, whether they live in suburban towns, urban centers or rural hamlets.  

The League believes that our state needs to strengthen the mental health supports for our youth and young adults, even in these difficult economic times, as an essential investment in preserving public safety in our communities.

The Canton LWV had already planned, before tragedy struck in Newtown, to begin a study on mental health issues in the Farmington Valley.

The League also supports measures to protect the health and safety of citizens through regulating the ownership of handguns and semi-automatic weapons. Our statewide League works with CT Against Gun Violence (CAGV.org) to support public safety gun regulation.

In light of the Newtown tragedy, CT has become the focus of national attention. How we respond may impact the national debate disproportionate to our small size. Now is the time for a focused, sustained effort to pass common sense laws here in CT and in Congress – provisions that a majority of Americans of either political party can support, such as banning large capacity ammunition magazines, and renewing the federal ban on assault weapons.

The League urges you to send this message to your elected representatives: It is imperative to ban large capacity ammunition magazines. Sending this message is easy:

- for state officials, visit cagv.org and on the right, click on Legislative Action Center under Take Action, and 

- locate your federal officials at http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

We also urge you to learn more about the CT Chapter of the National Alliance on Mental Illness at http://www.namict.org/. And if you are interested in learning more about the Canton LWV’s study on mental health, contact Gina Magennis at 860-693-6175 or g.magennis76@gmail.com.

Gina Magennis and Jane Latus

Co-Presidents

League of Women Voters of Canton

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Canton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Larry Litton May 22, 2013 at 10:49 am
Well said Mr. Franks! A new town garage is needed, but not at that price tag. The town leadershipRead More needs to offer a far better option to the voters than this. I am also voting NO...
Steve Roberto May 22, 2013 at 03:06 pm
Hey Larry, Wyatt asked you for the other 3 sites. Lets hear your answer and why exactly you feelRead More they will work. The EDA has been saying garbage like that for over a year. The Board of Selectman asked them three times to share their data. Of course they delivered nothing yet continue to say there is a better way. They have had plenty of times to show a better plan.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:26 pm
Hear, hear, Sarah. The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard"Read More attitude--it has nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 11:41 am
@Larry. What are the 3 sites?
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard" attitude--it hasRead More nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 10:52 am
@Steve. Kudos! Nice to see some common sense and decency. The actions of "Citizens for aRead More Better Canton" have been shameful to say the least - attacking critics, distributing misleading information and attacking the good people who volunteer their time to make Canton a better place to live.
Steve Roberto May 21, 2013 at 04:05 pm
It makes me chuckle when someone spends weeks mudslinging, finger pointing, and pot shotting untilRead More the targets of their harassments speak up and then they decide the game is over, well sorry, I have only just begun. I was sickened by the behavior of certain people at the town meeting scheduled to discuss this garage project. Most of them where given a script to read using lies and incorrect numbers to attack members of town boards and commission. They attacked the intelligence, ethics, and integrity of members of the Board of Selectmen, Board of Finance, Permanent Municipal Building Committee and project consultants. You have even managed to involve our neighbors from Barkhamsted in your May 15 Patch submission, referring to them as “Hairshirt wearing radicals who don’t wash their cars”, again full of incorrect numbers and misinformation. I am attending a Board of Ethics Meeting tonight to defend myself from mud slung on me by those finger pointers trying to distract from the facts at hand. These very same people told this town that they wanted a football field and they wanted a pool. They said that the folks in Canton deserved these things. They understood that these things came with a price tag and they were ready to pay it. Funny how the song has changed now that we have changed our focus to a much less glamorous project. Perhaps if we were proposing a hockey rink or an equestrian team $5.4 million wouldn’t be so much.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard" attitude--it hasRead More nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:32 pm
The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard" attitude--it hasRead More nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Solinsky EyeCare May 21, 2013 at 02:45 pm
We are located at 1013 Farmington Avenue in West Hartford. See you there!
Nancy May 20, 2013 at 09:32 am
Where are you located, Solinsky Eyecare?