.
Feedback

(UPDATE) Power Is Coming Back to Connecticut: How is Your Town Faring?

A list of all CL&P customers by town with outages as of 9:10 a.m. on Sunday, Nov. 6

It's been one heck of a week for Connecticut residents, particularly those in the Farmington Valley and in north central Connecticut.

As of 9:10 a.m. on Sunday, Nov. 6, Connecticut Light & Power is reporting that 9 percent of customers are still without power. Here is a statewide snapshot based on the latest online update. How is your town faring? 

For updates, text the word outage and your zip code to 24612.

Call 800-286-2000 or 860-947-2000 to report outages.

Town Name Customers Served Estimated Customers Affected % of Total ANDOVER 1396 2 0.14 ASHFORD 2166 506 23
AVON 8663 2966 34
BARKHAMSTED 1744 282 16
BEACON FALLS 2666 9 0.34
BERLIN 9501 125 1
BETHANY 2305 29 1
BETHEL 8301 787 9
BETHLEHEM 1861 551 29
BLOOMFIELD 10009 5695 56
BOLTON 2216 178 8 BRANFORD 16271 0
0
BRIDGEWATER 958 139 14
BRISTOL 29446 1630 5
BROOKFIELD 7799 1521 19
BROOKLYN 3543 1 0.03 BURLINGTON 3667 967 26
CANAAN 1276 88 8
CANTERBURY 2215 0
0
CANTON

4928 2072 46 CHAPLIN 1100 1 0.09 CHESHIRE 11236 350 3
CHESTER 2048 0
0 CLINTON 6984 0 0 COLCHESTER 6999 18 0.26 COLEBROOK 810 43 5 COLUMBIA 2440 2 0.08 CORNWALL 1186 64 5 COVENTRY 5464 985 18
CROMWELL 6935 34 0.49
DANBURY 35248 2337 6
DARIEN 7858 4 0.05 DEEP RIVER 2408 0 0 DURHAM 3073 44 1 EAST GRANBY 2611 438 16 EAST HADDAM 4823 8 0.17
EAST HAMPTON 6080 54 0.89
EAST HARTFORD 23140 1010 4
EAST LYME 9457 1 0.01 EAST WINDSOR 6180 1556 25 EASTFORD 877 30 3 ELLINGTON 7057 2200 31 ENFIELD 19108 4660 24 ESSEX 3921 0
0
FARMINGTON 12189 5869 48 FRANKLIN 979 3 0.31
GLASTONBURY 15403 2734 17 GOSHEN 1896 17 0.09 GRANBY 4691 1664 35 GREENWICH 27910 43 0.15
GRISWOLD 3373 0 0 GROTON 8174 0 0 GUILFORD 10777 0 0 HADDAM 3889 101 2 HAMPTON 863 0 0 HARTFORD 58021 1874 3 HARTLAND 868 107 12 HARWINTON 2495 611 24 HEBRON 3909 57 1
KENT 2107 118 5 KILLINGLY
8613 4 0.05
KILLINGWORTH 2826 2 0.07 LEBANON 2173 4 0.18 LEDYARD 6570 0
0
LISBON 1817 0
0 LITCHFIELD 4631 311 6 LYME 1315 2 0.15 MADISON 9039 0
0 MANCHESTER 28644 1516 5
MANSFIELD 6566 138 2 MARLBOROUGH 2624 13 2
MERIDEN 27670 752 2 MIDDLEBURY 3385 203 6 MIDDLEFIELD 2146 9 0.24 MIDDLETOWN 22588 244 1 MONROE 7905 650 8
MONTVILLE 7988 0
0
MORRIS 1382 118 8
NAUGATUCK 14340 78 0.54
NEW BRITAIN 34236 1028 3
NEW CANAAN 8371 214 2 NEW FAIRFIELD 6010 1044 17
NEW HARTFORD 3240 419 12 NEW LONDON 13747 1
0.01 NEW MILFORD 13742 1068 7 NEWINGTON 14559 437 3
NEWTOWN 10883 2253 20
NORFOLK 1114 2 0.18
NORTH CANAAN 1477 21 1
NORTH STONINGTON 2534 0 0
NORWALK 29702 48 0.16
OLD LYME 5450 0 0 OLD SAYBROOK 6799 0
0 OXFORD 5266 510 9
PLAINFIELD 7073 1 0.01 PLAINVILLE 9278 242 2
PLYMOUTH 5770 527 9
POMFRET 1874 16 0.85 PORTLAND 4569 41 0.9
PRESTON 2157 0 0
PROSPECT 3959 16 0.4 PUTNAM 5072 0 0
REDDING 3914 707 18 RIDGEFIELD 10646 2511 23 ROCKY HILL 157 50 0.50 ROXBURY 1330 334 25 SALEM 1889 1 0.05 SALISBURY 2969 410 13 SCOTLAND 711 0 0 SEYMOUR 7469 93 1 SHARON 2150 323 15 SHERMAN 1967 268 13 SIMSBURY 10104 5587 55 SOMERS 3924 2239 56 SOUTH WINDSOR 11543 3737 32 SOUTHBURY 9853 1676 17 SOUTHINGTON 19294 997 5 SPRAGUE 1406 1 0.07 STAFFORD 6140 2720 44 STAMFORD 54827 2 0 STERLING 1622 0 0 STONINGTON 7972 47 0.59 SUFFIELD 5996 1924 32 THOMASTON 3757 718 19 THOMPSON 4570 9 0.2 TOLLAND 6002 2639 43 TORRINGTON 18617 372 2 UNION 455 188 41 VERNON 15576 5371 43 VOLUNTOWN 1292 0 0 WARREN 784 30 3 WASHINGTON 2645 478 18 WATERBURY 50980 944 1 WATERFORD 9550 0 0 WATERTOWN 9973 361 3 WEST HARTFORD 28125 15939 56 WESTBROOK 4533 0 0 WESTON 3806 18 0.47 WESTPORT 12339 0 0 WETHERSFIELD 12364 120 0.97 WILLINGTON 2893 443 15 WILTON 7300 85 1 WINCHESTER 6146 371 6 WINDHAM 10450 1 0.01 WINDSOR 13120 1396 10 WINDSOR LOCKS 6273 2049 32 WOLCOTT 6876 73 1 WOODBURY 5116 780 215 WOODSTOCK 4080 47 1 Total Customers Affected 112,294 9

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Canton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Larry Litton May 22, 2013 at 10:49 am
Well said Mr. Franks! A new town garage is needed, but not at that price tag. The town leadershipRead More needs to offer a far better option to the voters than this. I am also voting NO...
Steve Roberto May 22, 2013 at 03:06 pm
Hey Larry, Wyatt asked you for the other 3 sites. Lets hear your answer and why exactly you feelRead More they will work. The EDA has been saying garbage like that for over a year. The Board of Selectman asked them three times to share their data. Of course they delivered nothing yet continue to say there is a better way. They have had plenty of times to show a better plan.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:26 pm
Hear, hear, Sarah. The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard"Read More attitude--it has nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 11:41 am
@Larry. What are the 3 sites?
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard" attitude--it hasRead More nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 10:52 am
@Steve. Kudos! Nice to see some common sense and decency. The actions of "Citizens for aRead More Better Canton" have been shameful to say the least - attacking critics, distributing misleading information and attacking the good people who volunteer their time to make Canton a better place to live.
Steve Roberto May 21, 2013 at 04:05 pm
It makes me chuckle when someone spends weeks mudslinging, finger pointing, and pot shotting untilRead More the targets of their harassments speak up and then they decide the game is over, well sorry, I have only just begun. I was sickened by the behavior of certain people at the town meeting scheduled to discuss this garage project. Most of them where given a script to read using lies and incorrect numbers to attack members of town boards and commission. They attacked the intelligence, ethics, and integrity of members of the Board of Selectmen, Board of Finance, Permanent Municipal Building Committee and project consultants. You have even managed to involve our neighbors from Barkhamsted in your May 15 Patch submission, referring to them as “Hairshirt wearing radicals who don’t wash their cars”, again full of incorrect numbers and misinformation. I am attending a Board of Ethics Meeting tonight to defend myself from mud slung on me by those finger pointers trying to distract from the facts at hand. These very same people told this town that they wanted a football field and they wanted a pool. They said that the folks in Canton deserved these things. They understood that these things came with a price tag and they were ready to pay it. Funny how the song has changed now that we have changed our focus to a much less glamorous project. Perhaps if we were proposing a hockey rink or an equestrian team $5.4 million wouldn’t be so much.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard" attitude--it hasRead More nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:32 pm
The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard" attitude--it hasRead More nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Solinsky EyeCare May 21, 2013 at 02:45 pm
We are located at 1013 Farmington Avenue in West Hartford. See you there!
Nancy May 20, 2013 at 09:32 am
Where are you located, Solinsky Eyecare?