.
Feedback

Longtime Zoning Commissioners Bypassed, New Members Appointed

Most selectmen say changes were necessary due to delay in updating regulations, town’s reputation as ‘anti-business’

For the second time this year, there’s been substantial changes in Canton’s Zoning Commission membership, with the Board of Selectmen bypassing two long-time members and another resigning in protest.

On Wednesday night selectmen appointed new members Dan Barnhart, a Republican, and John Huyghebaert, who is unaffiliated. The board also reappointed Republican Phil Pane.

Not on the agenda for reappointment, however, were alternate Jeffrey Johnson and two regular members — Republican Katherine E. Hooker and chairman Jay Weintraub, a Democrat. The latter two had been regular members since April of 1991, according to commission agendas, and alternate members even longer. Their terms expire Jan. 3, 2013. 

“We appreciate the service they have provided for the town but felt it was time for a change in terms of composition,” First Selectman Richard Barlow said.

Also gone from the commission is Democrat Sandra Trionfini, who on Dec. 21, she sent Barlow a resignation e-mail, stating her reason as the “incredible short sightedness on the part of the Board of Selectmen.”

Barlow said no final decision had been made on Johnson.

Weintraub expressed an interest in continuing and had recommended Hooker be reappointed as well, Barlow said, but he and others gave a few reasons for the decision.

First, Barlow said, is the length of the zoning rewrite process, which, according to the town’s web site, formally began in September of 2005, with the goal of implementation by November of 2006.

Several other selectmen concurred.

“For years we’ve been hearing it’s almost done,” selectman Tom Sevigny said Thursday. “I think the majority of the board agrees there needs to be changes.”

Weintraub could not be reached for comment but in March of 2012 told Patch the process had been plagued with problems, including initial misguidance from a consultant, various town planners and, at times, lack of a quorum, which eventually resulted in a re-write committee of fewer members. Now that entire subcommittee, which had most recently consisted of Weintraub, Hooker and Trionfini, is out. 

Thursday, town Planner Neil Pade said the goal is to get the draft of the changes to the full Zoning Commission in the first quarter of 2013. After that it would be shared with the Planning Commission and go through an adoption process that would include chances for the public to comment.

Barlow said he doesn't expect the changes in membership to delay the process. 

Barlow said his other main reason for changes in commission membership is the reputation Canton’s land-use boards have for being “anti-business,” a charge he’s heard since taking office.

The re-write is designed to address some issues. Most commission members, selectmen and business leaders, for example, have agreed that more types of businesses should be allowed “by right.” Currently, many small businesses have to come though the zoning commission if they are opening a type of business not previously approved for a particular space. The changes would allow more to open through a less expensive and time-consuming process.

Barlow was quick to say that in some cases the anti-business reputation is not warranted. The land-use process is complicated and regulations, state statutes or the need to fully vet an issue often binds the commission, he said. 

Selectmen also acknowledge that some developers request hearing continuances to resolve issues or in some cases are not prepared. 

Still, several selectmen said personnel changes would help. 

“At some point, perception becomes reality,” Barlow said. “With new people hopefully we can dissuade some of those concerns.”

“There’s has been an overall feeling that it is time for some changes,” added selectman Steve Roberto.

Sevigny said he also feels it unacceptable that the commission and other boards never adopted most of the changes recommend in the town’s 2003 Plan of Conservation and Development.

Several selectmen said they also plan to continue discussions about board consolidation. For example, some advocate combining the planning and zoning commissions although past charter revision commissions chose not to combine the two. 

In addition, this is not the first time selectmen have bypassed zoning commission members who were willing to continue.

Earlier this year, Barlow passed on members Peter Clarke and Mark Podesla for reappointment.

At the time, selectman Lowell Humphrey objected to the process. This week, he said he has talked to the town attorney and understands the procedure being followed is acceptable by town charter but still feels it sends the wrong message to volunteers, especially when there are unfilled alternate slots on the commission. (Trionfini’s slot will also need to be filled).

“It sends an awful message to those serving and those considering serving,” Humphrey said.

Humphrey said it’s also a decision made outside of the public eye and feels the members should at least have the chance to publicly defend their record.

Hooker and Weintraub could not be reached for comment over the last two days but Patch will add their statements if received.

Trionfini declined to expand on her short-sighted comment but did praise Weintraub and Hooker's service.

“I enjoyed my years on the commission especially working with Jay and Kathy — both extremely capable and hard-working individuals,” Trionfini said.

 

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Canton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Peter May 22, 2013 at 05:38 pm
I voted no - this thing is a joke. it's not a public facilty, it's a truck shed. you can buy steelRead More garage enclosures for $200K that will accomplish the exact same result.
Larry Litton May 22, 2013 at 10:49 am
Well said Mr. Franks! A new town garage is needed, but not at that price tag. The town leadershipRead More needs to offer a far better option to the voters than this. I am also voting NO...
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:06 pm
you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to beRead More violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Peter May 22, 2013 at 05:41 pm
Another person claiming the people of Canton are not informed... but you offer no information, justRead More your opinion that we should blindly vote yes. No has yet been able to articulate the "why" and the "value"... what is the return on investment in this pet project? This garage is an absolute SCAM... it's someone's get-rich quick scheme and they will be walking away with $4M and we will be left with a $1.4M garage that isn't needed.
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 05:13 pm
@Larry. Thanks for the reply. I don't know the details of these sites or why they weren't chosen butRead More I do have a few initial thoughts. First, one of the concerns of opponents of the Commerce Drive location is that the garage is a danger to nearby residents, children, bikers and seniors. Those concerns would still exist and would likely be worse in any of the 3 locations you mentioned. In other words, the same problems as the opponents raise now would remain. Second, River Road and Lawton Road are already designated for youth sports. Given the lack of flat land and the shortage of fields in Canton, I don't see how these fields would be replaced. Fields can be built at the River Rd and Lawton Road locations but not on Commerced River. As for the state-owned parcel, I think the state owns that as open space - not land for a town garage. Third, if the people on Lawton Road got so upset about the CVS, I could only imagine the uproar if the town garage is built there! Some don't even want the park! Fourth, I think there is some builout problems with lawton road regarding utilities which makes the site difficult to work with. (or so I read/was told) However, thank you again for the reply. the only real option besides commerce drive is River Road, but as I mentioned above, the opponent's concerns regarding safety would still exist and likely be even worse - right by the bike trail, kids in the area, near a major road, near homes. I don't think that site would satisfy them.
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:06 pm
you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to beRead More violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Wyatt May 22, 2013 at 10:52 am
@Steve. Kudos! Nice to see some common sense and decency. The actions of "Citizens for aRead More Better Canton" have been shameful to say the least - attacking critics, distributing misleading information and attacking the good people who volunteer their time to make Canton a better place to live.
Steve Roberto May 21, 2013 at 04:05 pm
It makes me chuckle when someone spends weeks mudslinging, finger pointing, and pot shotting untilRead More the targets of their harassments speak up and then they decide the game is over, well sorry, I have only just begun. I was sickened by the behavior of certain people at the town meeting scheduled to discuss this garage project. Most of them where given a script to read using lies and incorrect numbers to attack members of town boards and commission. They attacked the intelligence, ethics, and integrity of members of the Board of Selectmen, Board of Finance, Permanent Municipal Building Committee and project consultants. You have even managed to involve our neighbors from Barkhamsted in your May 15 Patch submission, referring to them as “Hairshirt wearing radicals who don’t wash their cars”, again full of incorrect numbers and misinformation. I am attending a Board of Ethics Meeting tonight to defend myself from mud slung on me by those finger pointers trying to distract from the facts at hand. These very same people told this town that they wanted a football field and they wanted a pool. They said that the folks in Canton deserved these things. They understood that these things came with a price tag and they were ready to pay it. Funny how the song has changed now that we have changed our focus to a much less glamorous project. Perhaps if we were proposing a hockey rink or an equestrian team $5.4 million wouldn’t be so much.
Kevin Jackson May 22, 2013 at 09:39 pm
Sorry Wayne, the real reason was our elected "leaders" couldn't produce a clear case forRead More why we should vote yes and they were unwilling to allow anyone else to bring viable solutions to the table.
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:03 pm
There is one BIG BIG thing missing from this entire six year long process. the need was neverRead More assessed, there is no return on investment, it's complete overkill and wasteful spending and no one challenged the outrageously over priced estimates. And this was not very public... all the key documents are pretty well hidden on Canton's site.. if you don't happen to get the secret hidden link then you won't get the facts. you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to be violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Solinsky EyeCare May 21, 2013 at 02:45 pm
We are located at 1013 Farmington Avenue in West Hartford. See you there!
Nancy May 20, 2013 at 09:32 am
Where are you located, Solinsky Eyecare?