.
Feedback

EPA to Further Evaluate Contaminated Property in Canton

Route 44 property has never been cleaned up on state level; Officials hope feds can bring additional resources.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is looking to further evaluate contamination at the site of a former chemical operation on Route 44, according to a letter copied to First Selectman Richard Barlow.

For many years, John Swift Chemical, or Chemical J. Swift, cleaned and distilled spent industrial solvents at 51 Albany Turnpike, contaminating the property along the way, according to numerous state and federal documents. The company closed circa 1972.

Polluted water migrated off the site, contaminating nearby wells and in the early 1990s several nearby homes were connected to public water supply, according to documents from the state attorney general’s office.

The recent letter seeks permission from current property owner Cadle Properties of CT to evaluate “whether hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants may be, or may have been released to the environment.”

It was not immediately clear if Cadle has granted the access or if the EPA would need to pursue other means. (An EPA representative has agreed to provide some further information on the process and we will update this story as that is presented)

The site has been on the state "Superfund" list for years but has never been cleaned-up, despite various past actions, including judgments against property owners, a push for it to be included in state bonding packages and attempts by town officials to work out a clean-up and sale agreement with the state.

Now the hope is the federal government can bring additional resources to the effort.

“It has not progressed so we’ve asked the EPA to get involved again,” said Maurice Hamel, analyst with the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection’s remediation division.

Cleanup estimates have varied but First Selectman Richard Barlow said the latest proposals he had seen were approximately $4 million from the cleanup and funding of state studies.   

The recent letter, dated Nov. 28, 2012, is not the EPA’s first action on the property. According to its Web site, the EPA has assessed the site in the past and in 1994 considered adding it to the National Priority List of Superfund sites. In 2001, however, it was deemed a low priority for further assessment.

That designation, however, was not because the contamination was not serious but rather that there was some hope that it would taken care of on the state level, Hamel said.

That year, the state won a $2.1 million judgment against Cadle. In 1997, it won a $9 million judgment from former owner Gianfranco Galluzzo, who purchased the property from Auto World Enterprises in 1986 before selling to Cadle, according to past AG press releases.

This week, a representative from the attorney general’s office said that money had not been collected and acknowledged the judgments can be difficult to enforce.

Officials said there are no immediate health dangers for those at the site but are still concerned with groundwater and aquifer contamination. 

Mitchell Volkswagen is currently operating at the site.

The town is also trying to collect taxes on the property, which Cadle has not paid. In 2011, the town successfully petitioned a Connecticut court to appoint a "receiver," whoassumes the role of a landlord. The receiver would collected "rent" from the parent company of Mitchell Volkswagen, take out fees and expenses, and give the rest to the town to apply to the tax bill. At the time the tax bill, including leans and penalties, exceeded $800,000. Mitchell's parent company has appealed the case and it is still pending. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Canton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 07:42 pm
"this thing is a joke" isn't reasoned argument and no one should listen to anyone whoRead More refuses to give his last hame.
Peter May 22, 2013 at 05:38 pm
I voted no - this thing is a joke. it's not a public facilty, it's a truck shed. you can buy steelRead More garage enclosures for $200K that will accomplish the exact same result.
Larry Litton May 22, 2013 at 10:49 am
Well said Mr. Franks! A new town garage is needed, but not at that price tag. The town leadershipRead More needs to offer a far better option to the voters than this. I am also voting NO...
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 07:56 pm
Peter, "grub site" means to remove brush and shrubs not remove june bug grubs--but I thinkRead More you knew that. Two acres not two trees, etc. Do you really believe the educated people of Canton are so stupid that they will fall for last minute scare tactics? Not only are you dishonest but you are a coward for hiding behind an alias.
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:06 pm
you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to beRead More violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Peter May 22, 2013 at 05:41 pm
Another person claiming the people of Canton are not informed... but you offer no information, justRead More your opinion that we should blindly vote yes. No has yet been able to articulate the "why" and the "value"... what is the return on investment in this pet project? This garage is an absolute SCAM... it's someone's get-rich quick scheme and they will be walking away with $4M and we will be left with a $1.4M garage that isn't needed.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 07:58 pm
Peter, "grub site" means to remove brush and shrubs not remove june bug grubs--but I thinkRead More you knew that. Two acres not two trees, etc. Do you really believe the educated people of Canton are so stupid that they will fall for last minute scare tactics? Not only are you dishonest but you are a coward for hiding behind an alias.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 07:56 pm
Peter, "grub site" means to remove brush and shrubs not remove june bug grubs--but I thinkRead More you knew that. Two acres not two trees, etc. Do you really believe the educated people of Canton are so stupid that they will fall for last minute scare tactics? Not only are you dishonest but you are a coward for hiding behind an alias.
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:06 pm
you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to beRead More violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard" attitude--it hasRead More nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 07:59 pm
Peter, "grub site" means to remove brush and shrubs not remove june bug grubs--but I thinkRead More you knew that. Two acres not two trees, etc. Do you really believe the educated people of Canton are so stupid that they will fall for last minute scare tactics? Not only are you dishonest but you are a coward for hiding behind an alias.
Peter May 22, 2013 at 06:03 pm
There is one BIG BIG thing missing from this entire six year long process. the need was neverRead More assessed, there is no return on investment, it's complete overkill and wasteful spending and no one challenged the outrageously over priced estimates. And this was not very public... all the key documents are pretty well hidden on Canton's site.. if you don't happen to get the secret hidden link then you won't get the facts. you want facts.. go here: http://www.townofcantonct.org/content/74/14580.aspx and be prepared to be violently mad! $47,500 for grub removal on the lawn $20,000 to cut down 2 trees (doesn't the town do that already?) $3,000 for a flag-less flag pole $4,000 break room counter $1,000 for a one urinal screen $5,000 for a toilet paper dispenser $10,000 locker for our few employees $500,000 for A/C so our trucks stay cool in the summer $16,000 for a hot water tank (sears has for $400) and many many many more scams
Wayne Jekot May 22, 2013 at 01:32 pm
The real reason people are opposing this plan is a "not in my backyard" attitude--it hasRead More nothing to do with cost. If so many people in town were so concerned about wasteful expenditures, we would have heard them complain about $3.6 million for a track and field! When the "dumb" location argument failed to make headway, the opponents to the "dumb" garage plan, acting purely out of self-interest and not for the common good, switched to a financial argument. You can't fool me: I voted yes.
Solinsky EyeCare May 21, 2013 at 02:45 pm
We are located at 1013 Farmington Avenue in West Hartford. See you there!
Nancy May 20, 2013 at 09:32 am
Where are you located, Solinsky Eyecare?